A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning future neighbours around the development of the wall at a coastal web page in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which includes captivated national awareness following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members house at Sutton Strand, where allegations of organizing breaches, environmental concerns, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Situations short article about René Collier and also the Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has evolved into a very publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about design works at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a business director respectively, search for to build their family members house. The case is now emblematic of wider disputes alongside Eire’s coastline, the place enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of established citizens. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting created by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted below setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their preparing authorization by creating a wall over and above the boundaries in their website, leading to an encroachment over a Specific Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, as such areas are subject matter to rigid controls under European and Irish environmental law. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological implications, significantly in the delicate coastal surroundings like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their planning permission, and say the wall, and that is partially constructed, is in the right placement. Their legal crew has characterised the action as an try and delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The few accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that's been recurring in court and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal preparing disputes, where by views of The ocean are both hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable endeavours by the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, Based on sworn proof referenced during the Irish Occasions. In one account, Rene Collier waded through waistline-higher drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions, a picture which includes because develop into emblematic of your intensity on the dispute. These steps weren't just symbolic; they ended up intended to Assemble visual proof of the wall’s position relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances reported, describing how the two Guys entered the drinking water during critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm h2o to photograph the website became The most putting descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that this kind of steps had been cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception the wall extended into a region influenced by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was currently being encroached upon.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being included intimately from the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to comprehend the qualifications and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court read further more submissions on whether or not interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key second while in the lawful timeline.
At the core of the dispute is usually a disagreement about boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain which the wall, as built, goes outside of what was authorized and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of preparing paperwork, maps, and ailments attached to your authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their action is inspired by problem for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving a private view, insisting alternatively that it's about making sure that progress at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have explained their extended-standing link to the Accountant Paul Feely region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a few simply just looking to build a loved ones residence in accordance with the law. They deny the wall encroaches with a Exclusive Location of Conservation and say that every one works happen to be carried out according to professional information and authorized strategies. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, never alter the fundamental facts.
The case has also lifted broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute above construction of wall at coastal internet site has become a shorthand description for any situation that lots of observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation in between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Earlier been involved in local advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from quite various Experienced backgrounds can find them selves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-superior water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded as a result of waist-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality on the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an excessive approach.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the outcome remains uncertain. The court docket will have to determine whether or not the wall as crafted complies with scheduling authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and preparing conditions. Still the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another prolonged after the lawful charges are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development functions at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation lengthen further than that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. Furthermore, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns which include environmental safety and residence legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of pure beauty and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre of your dispute stands partially developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter whether it will eventually in the end be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will count on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to One of the more intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin in recent years.