A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst prospective neighbours around the construction of a wall at a coastal web-site inside a north Dublin suburb, a situation which includes captivated countrywide consideration pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier and also the Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a local disagreement has evolved into a highly publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design is effective at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, find to create their household residence. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes alongside Eire’s coastline, wherever progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting constructed by their possible neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted under setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those inhabitants of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their scheduling permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result areas are matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological outcomes, especially in the delicate coastal atmosphere for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which is partially created, is in the proper position. Their legal crew has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their look at, an allegation that's been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal planning disputes, exactly where views of the sea are both extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable endeavours through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the website, Based on sworn proof referenced during the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by means of waist-high h2o through a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances, a picture which has given that turn out to be emblematic of the depth in the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they ended up intended to Assemble visual proof in the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o for the duration of severe climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the internet site became One of the more hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these kinds of steps had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been included intimately from the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as readers sought to grasp the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to even more submissions on whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment within the legal timeline.
In the core of the dispute is really a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as constructed, goes beyond what was authorised and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has become described as meticulous in René Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times his assessment of setting up paperwork, maps, and situations hooked up to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is motivated by issue for environmental defense and adherence to arranging regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public view, insisting instead that it is about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have got described their long-standing link to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple basically wanting to make a family members household in accordance With all the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Particular Location of Conservation and say that every one works are already performed according to Skilled tips and accredited plans. Their legal professionals have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like coming into the sea for the duration of a storm, tend not to alter the underlying specifics.
The case has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than construction of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description to get a scenario that a lot of observers see as more and more typical. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become much more contentious.
The Irish Occasions article about René Collier observed the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with local advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waist-substantial h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by waist-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting the two the Bodily fact of the coastline and also the symbolic character on the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an abnormal solution.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome continues to be unsure. The court docket ought to identify whether or not the wall as built complies with planning authorization and no matter if any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and preparing conditions. Yet the human ingredient continues to be central: neighbours who have to Dwell alongside one another very long following the legal prices are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction will work at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend further than that tackle. For planners, developers, and residents alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how speedily an area disagreement can escalate when basic issues for example environmental security and house legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre of your dispute stands partially created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it's going to in the long run be altered, removed, or finished as planned will depend upon the court docket’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will possible proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to one of the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent years.